Wing Flaps (Gusty Conditions)?

A place to relax and discuss flying topics.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

KevinS
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:05 pm

Wing Flaps (Gusty Conditions)?

Post by KevinS »

Hello

I had an interesting experience the other day and wanted to toss out a question to the group. I went out flying in the morning with relatively light winds but when I returned to my home airport the tower was reporting winds at 210 (mag) 20G25kts.

I am a fairly low time 170 pilot (~40hr in my 170B) and these winds were the strongest that I have experienced. The winds favoured Rwy 20.

My question is what flaps settings (if any) would most of you have used with these winds? I decided to only use 10 deg and the landing was a bit hairy (but not unsafe). Would some of you have used full flaps in this instance? I look forward to your insights.

thanks

Kevin Shaw
User avatar
15A
Posts: 220
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 1:03 pm

Re: Wing Flaps (Gusty Conditions)?

Post by 15A »

Kevin,

I had the same situation yesterday coming back from Nantucket. Winds were light in the morning, but coming home early afternoon, things were different! I swooped by my house on the lake and saw the water had white caps from one end to the other. I got back to the airport (KTAN) and everyone was using 12, a 90 deg crosswind with the sock straight out. But we also have a short, dirt strip (4/22) and the wind was blowing straight down 22. This dirt strip has been neglected by airport management, ruts, rocks, but that's a whole nother story...
Regardless, 10 degrees downwind, second notch turning base, and third snap on final. A little power to hold me over the trees, and greased it. (wheel landing) Had good control all the way. Retracted the barn doors after touch down and taxied to the hanger.

I've done it both ways. Flap and no flap. I find without the flaps, I'm flying down the runway, dipping my wing, cross controlling it. Always flying it 'til it slows down. Flaps and a little power give you good control.
BUT... that's only my opinion. Everybody seems to have their own style and preferences. I recommend doing what you're most comfortable with.

And needless to say, if things get ugly, power up and go around!
Joe Craig
'56 C172 Taildragger N6915A
'46 Aeronca Champ N65HM
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21042
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Wing Flaps (Gusty Conditions)?

Post by GAHorn »

Unless I am really heavy (back seat occupied) I usually only use 30-deg flaps for landing. In gusty winds, I still prefer flaps and carry power, as I find their drag helps to stabilize the approach. In very strong cross-winds I reduce flaps as much as possible, preferring zero flaps. (B-model flaps tend to blank the elevator on the downwind side, and reduce rudder effectiveness, in my opinion.)
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
Bruce Fenstermacher
Posts: 10324
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am

Re: Wing Flaps (Gusty Conditions)?

Post by Bruce Fenstermacher »

Hard to say what I might have done but if I wasn't just goofing off and just wanted to land with no frills (I like frills) I probably would have used 30 degrees of flap and keeped the speed up a pinch till I was ready to touch down.

You had the right idea reducing flaps.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!

Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
markeg1964
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 7:35 pm

Re: Wing Flaps (Gusty Conditions)?

Post by markeg1964 »

Yet another advantage of the A model. I learned to fly in my 170A and was taught by my instructor (an old 170B pilot) to use two notches of flaps regardless. In his opinion it makes no difference when flying an A model. 8O I have since learned to use the additional notches. :D
Mark

Twin Oaks Airpark
1950 170A N5528C
User avatar
N4281V
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 2:04 am

Re: Wing Flaps (Gusty Conditions)?

Post by N4281V »

...at least you guys have flaps! Seems ragwing flaps are useless except for walking into... :roll: :lol:

Not too long after I bought 81V I ran out of aileron during a crosswind landing. Asked the former owner about it and he said that sometimes happens.

Anyone else have this happen with the ragwing model?
Ann W.
1948 Cessna 170
N4281V (sn 18699 - wings) & the former N4147V (sn 18479 - fuselage)
voorheesh
Posts: 590
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 5:22 am

Re: Wing Flaps (Gusty Conditions)?

Post by voorheesh »

Sounds like it was a pretty strong xwind. You'll run out of aileron in ragwing or metal if its blowing too hard.
User avatar
Bruce Fenstermacher
Posts: 10324
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am

Re: Wing Flaps (Gusty Conditions)?

Post by Bruce Fenstermacher »

Ann I can not make first hand comments but have heard that aileron authority in extreme situations is a bit week on the '48.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!

Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
Robert Eilers
Posts: 652
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 12:33 am

Re: Wing Flaps (Gusty Conditions)?

Post by Robert Eilers »

I have found I maintain better aileron authority in a strong crosswind by useing 20 degrees or less flaps and making a wheel landing. Just pay attention to the tail as the aircraft slows.
"You have to learn how to fall before you learn how to fly"
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21042
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Wing Flaps (Gusty Conditions)?

Post by GAHorn »

N4281V wrote:...at least you guys have flaps! Seems ragwing flaps are useless except for walking into... :roll: :lol:

Not too long after I bought 81V I ran out of aileron during a crosswind landing. Asked the former owner about it and he said that sometimes happens.

Anyone else have this happen with the ragwing model?
Ann, the "ragwing" 170 was a development out of the Cessna 120/140. The wingspan was increased to accomodate additional fuel, but the ailerons remained the same with the result that the airplane has a slightly slower roll-rate than a 120/140. The metal wing 170s have more aileron authority.

Do not take it to mean the ragwing is an inferior airplane. It's not! It's a good airplane... it just has a different handling characteristic in roll than the metal wing airplanes. Sort of like the A-model isn't really inferior to a B-model. Like the ragwing, they just don't have any flaps. Image
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
hilltop170
Posts: 3485
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 6:05 pm

Re: Wing Flaps (Gusty Conditions)?

Post by hilltop170 »

George-
A good pilot doesn't need flaps! 8O
Richard Pulley
2014-2016 TIC170A Past President
1951 170A, N1715D, s/n 20158, O-300D
2023 Best Original 170A at Sault Ste. Marie
Owned from 1973 to 1984.
Bought again in 2006 after 22 years.
It's not for sale!
dacker
Posts: 412
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 2:05 am

Re: Wing Flaps (Gusty Conditions)?

Post by dacker »

That George... :roll:
For those that think those little flaps on the A model don't provide lift... take'em off, strap them to yore arms, get in the back of yore buddies pickem'up truck, and when he gets it up to about 80, stick em out in the wind at a fifty degree angle! 8)
David
User avatar
N4281V
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 2:04 am

Re: Wing Flaps (Gusty Conditions)?

Post by N4281V »

We've always laughed since the procedure for short field takeoff in the ragwing is full "flaps". And with my prop pitched as it is (super climb I call it) I don't need but maybe 600' on the big runway here in Elmira. And hilltop170 is right - you don't really need flaps! Seems I sometimes slip the 170 anyway (no restrictions since the flaps are soooo small) on final. It's certainly a different airplane than a "milk-stool" Skyhawk so you just have to have the self-assurance that you just can't do everything a 'hawk or 'wagon can do. :cry:

Proud ragwing owner...!! :mrgreen:
Ann W.
1948 Cessna 170
N4281V (sn 18699 - wings) & the former N4147V (sn 18479 - fuselage)
1SeventyZ
Posts: 253
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 2:08 am

Re: Wing Flaps (Gusty Conditions)?

Post by 1SeventyZ »

I've been wondering about this too, as I nearly groundlooped twice in one day landing with 13G18 and 20 deg flaps. Hindsight tells me that I was just approaching way to slow, dropped it the last few inches, and snoozed on the rudder while that crosswind tried to weathervane me.

I'm much more comfortable 3-pointing in a crosswind, because pinning the tailwheel with full aft elevator seems much more stable than wheelie-ing. Even if you wheelie, and maintain a good track on the rollout, you have to transition through that dead zone of control authority...what then? I usually just get the tail on the ground as soon as I feel the dead zone coming on, and pin it.

Lots of guys on the Backcountry website talk about retracting flaps immediately upon touchdown, but that seems a little hairy too since you have to reach for the handle during a very directionally sensitive time.
Robert Eilers
Posts: 652
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 12:33 am

Re: Wing Flaps (Gusty Conditions)?

Post by Robert Eilers »

I have thought about retracting the flaps after a three pointer as soon as possible. But, in a crosswind for the reasons stated I have hesitated trying to lower the flaps while I am struggling with directional control. However, if I try to apply brakes shortly after a three pointer with full flaps the mains skid like they might on ice - and I am not hitting the brakes hard. I take comfort in the fact that when I need to land seriously short I am generally on grass or dirt and the tires react differently.
"You have to learn how to fall before you learn how to fly"
Post Reply