Legal prop for 54B?
Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 3:06 am
Legal prop for 54B?
Today I found a McCauley 1A75/GM8242 for sale. Is this prop legal for my 54B? Thanks in advance for any help. Bryan
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 3:06 am
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:49 am
Re: Legal prop for 54B?
I've never heard of one installed on a 170 and I don't see it listed as an STC here:ALASKA99762 wrote:Today I found a McCauley 1A75/GM8242 for sale. Is this prop legal for my 54B? Thanks in advance for any help. Bryan
http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_an ... enFrameSet
I've got the 1A175-DM-8042 on mine, STC from Kenmore Air.
Corey
'53 170B N3198A #25842
Floats, Tundra Tires, and Skis
'53 170B N3198A #25842
Floats, Tundra Tires, and Skis
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:49 am
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 3:06 am
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:49 am
I never got to fly the plane with the cruise prop, but the previous owner put the plane on floats with the cruise prop first. He thought he had just made a huge financial error as the performance was horrible. So he sunk some more money into the climb (seaplane) prop and now it performs satisfactorily on floats. On wheels it's very impressive. I'm still new to flying but can consistently leave the pavement in about 400' (alone, full of fuel) and cruise is about 98 MPH.
Corey
'53 170B N3198A #25842
Floats, Tundra Tires, and Skis
'53 170B N3198A #25842
Floats, Tundra Tires, and Skis
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 3:06 am
99726, this is previously 99645. You don't have short field performance with the 7651. The only comparison between an apple and a bannana is that they are both fruit. The safety statement is absolutely correct! Most Alaskans end up tweaking their 80 props to 8043. The previous owner of my 55, had his prop at 8044, 42, & finally 43. There are plenty of Alaskan, 80" prop, 170B's, for you to catch a demonstration in. What tire's do you have? We need to go to PM, so we can talk without causing prop envy!
Props not specifically approved are ... not approved. And for good reason.
A prop that bolts up and fits....doesn't necesarily have the necessary vibration/harmonics with the engine. (In fact, there's actually some approved props that have limitations in that regard.) Lots of props are specifically NOT good in some installations for this reason. Vibration can destroy your engine and lead to serious loss of balance depending on what it takes with it when it leaves the airframe in flight and/or throws a blade with the resulting loss of control.
I've actually seen engines hanging from their hoses/wires/cables when they've been ripped out of their mounts due to defective props or unapproved prop installations.
Please don't simply assume a prop that will bolt onto the crank is all that's necessary to acheive an airworthy combination.
A prop that bolts up and fits....doesn't necesarily have the necessary vibration/harmonics with the engine. (In fact, there's actually some approved props that have limitations in that regard.) Lots of props are specifically NOT good in some installations for this reason. Vibration can destroy your engine and lead to serious loss of balance depending on what it takes with it when it leaves the airframe in flight and/or throws a blade with the resulting loss of control.
I've actually seen engines hanging from their hoses/wires/cables when they've been ripped out of their mounts due to defective props or unapproved prop installations.
Please don't simply assume a prop that will bolt onto the crank is all that's necessary to acheive an airworthy combination.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons.
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons.