Cessna 170 Resale values

A place to relax and discuss flying topics.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

User avatar
c170b53
Posts: 2527
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 8:01 pm

Re: Cessna 170 Resale values

Post by c170b53 »

Well it's always nice to visit an old thread, if not for the revelation of " I wrote that?"
I worked myself solidly into a corner and in spite of the good advice from Gary, a smaller shovel hasn't helped. I've got two rebuilds on the go. My hanger suffered damage from a storm that ripped part of the roof off, then the rain soaked the drywall which fell from the ceilings onto the planes. Of course the drywall had asbestos in it!
Now I'm thinking I need another plane to fly now and good planes are hard to find especially as the times have changed,bringing owners higher prices. Hasn't helped that the Canadian dollar has crashed or rather the greenback has launched. Another obstacle is finding something that has had good mods, done well. And one more, finding good paperwork or rather real paperwork. I thought I had something when a 56 came along but it's low s/n around 25000 ish suggested that it might be a Frankinscessna, reserected from the back of a hangar.
Still having fun with the search though and make sure you give your plane a hug when you think of it :D
Jim McIntosh..
1953 C170B S/N 25656
02 K1200RS
User avatar
blueldr
Posts: 4442
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 3:16 am

Re: Cessna 170 Resale values

Post by blueldr »

My home state, California, is reknown for its excessive taxes. The pain of those taxes is mitigated by the gross number of pretty girls and the great weather we enjoy.
Taxes on the ownership of a Cessna C-170 are mitigated by public display of an aged airplane on a regular basis.
There are no taxes for admireing either the pretty girls or the aged airplanes.
BL
User avatar
N2625U
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 2:21 pm

Re: Cessna 170 Resale values

Post by N2625U »

blueldr wrote:My home state, California, is reknown for its excessive taxes. The pain of those taxes is mitigated by the gross number of pretty girls and the great weather we enjoy.
Taxes on the ownership of a Cessna C-170 are mitigated by public display of an aged airplane on a regular basis.
There are no taxes for admireing either the pretty girls or the aged airplanes.
Yet....I'm sure the gov is thinking of that
Keep your speed up, Blackhawk on final behind you.
User avatar
MoonlightVFR
Posts: 624
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:55 pm

Re: Cessna 170 Resale values

Post by MoonlightVFR »

I am convinced that a late model C 170B delivers immense value to its owner.

We are talking all metal single engine, 4 seat, metal prop, 4 hours aloft full tank, correctly loaded.
A stable performer, a gentle cross country performer.

Compare the performance of a 1955 C170 B with a 2017 Cessna 172 tricycle model.

compare gross weight, empty weight, cruise speed, landing speed, fuel consummation, More...

The brand new Cessna does not hold any advantage over the 60 year old Cessna. Nothing. Oh the glass panel is unique

The Cessna was and is a genuine game changer

The value is there. Valuation is approximately $90,000. Market conditions constrain actual selling price to about 52,000. Compare the pricing to a lesser cloth covered Piper cub type and you will note the high value of a Cessna 170B.
gradyb, '54 B N2890C
User avatar
Bruce Fenstermacher
Posts: 10313
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am

Re: Cessna 170 Resale values

Post by Bruce Fenstermacher »

MoonlightVFR wrote: The value is there. Valuation is approximately $90,000. Market conditions constrain actual selling price to about 52,000. Compare the pricing to a lesser cloth covered Piper cub type and you will note the high value of a Cessna 170B.
It's a good thing a lot of Piper folks don't follow this forum or you would likely hear from a lot of them regarding calling a Piper Cub type a lesser cloth airplane. Fact is a Cessna 170 can not hold a candle to a Piper Cub type in many respects. And there are things a 170 can do much better thane a Cub type. They really are two different aircraft which is why I own one of each.

And the truth is I'm just as likely to sell the 170 and keep the Cub as I am to sell the Cub and keep the 170.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!

Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
User avatar
sfarringer
Posts: 309
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:49 pm

Re: Cessna 170 Resale values

Post by sfarringer »

MoonlightVFR wrote: .........a lesser cloth covered Piper cub type.......
Looks like an opinion presented as if it were a fact!
Ragwing S/N 18073
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 20967
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Cessna 170 Resale values

Post by GAHorn »

I'm betting he was speaking in terms of speed, seating capacity/carrying capacity, range, instrument capability......etc etc etc.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
Bruce Fenstermacher
Posts: 10313
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am

Re: Cessna 170 Resale values

Post by Bruce Fenstermacher »

gahorn wrote:I'm betting he was speaking in terms of speed, seating capacity/carrying capacity, range, instrument capability......etc etc etc.
What?

He wasn't talking about taking off in the length of the runway numbers or landing in half the distance a 170 can. Or burning 4 pgh or dropping pumpkins.

Speed, seating capacity, range, instrument capability are of little concern to a lot of Piper Cub types. :D
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!

Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 20967
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Cessna 170 Resale values

Post by GAHorn »

Bruce Fenstermacher wrote:[...
Speed, seating capacity, range, instrument capability are of little concern to a lot of Piper Cub types. :D
That's pretty evident. :twisted:
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
IA DPE
Posts: 208
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 1:46 am

Re: Cessna 170 Resale values

Post by IA DPE »

Obviously a J3 and a C170 were designed in different times for different missions. Comparing apples to apples, and having flown both a PA-16 Clipper and a PA-20 Pacer, I’ll take a C170 over either, and twice on Sunday. To me there’s just no comparison in handling or ergonomics.

I know both of those have their adherents and I’m glad they like them otherwise they’d be trying to buy our 170s and driving the price even higher.

The only other airplane I would’ve considered would be an Aeronca Sedan. I’ve never flown one though did help restore one. There are so few that supply is an issue, but there seems to be more buyers than sellers of 170s lately.
1955 C170B N2993D s/n 26936
1986 DG-400 N9966C
hilltop170
Posts: 3481
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 6:05 pm

Re: Cessna 170 Resale values

Post by hilltop170 »

Put 4 people in a Cub and fly 4 hours. See how many care how short it lands.

Try to take off on a 200' gravel bar in a 170.

Apples and oranges.

Both good at what they do.
Richard Pulley
2014-2016 TIC170A Past President
1951 170A, N1715D, s/n 20158, O-300D
Owned from 1973 to 1984.
Bought again in 2006 after 22 years.
It's not for sale!
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 20967
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Cessna 170 Resale values

Post by GAHorn »

I"ve flown 4-place Aeroncas and Stinsons and although they do about the same job as a 170.... they wallow-around and handle like a truck without shock abosorbers. The Tri-Pacer can be sporty, but not like the 170 which is so sweet, light, and responsive on the controls, and trying to get one of the Pipers above 8,000' can be a challenge.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
IA DPE
Posts: 208
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 1:46 am

Re: Cessna 170 Resale values

Post by IA DPE »

gahorn wrote:The Tri-Pacer can be sporty, but not like the 170 which is so sweet, light, and responsive on the controls, and trying to get one of the Pipers above 8,000' can be a challenge.
My personal opinion of the Clipper/ Pacer/ Tri Pacer is the same as a Seneca- they do nothing well. I didn’t even consider a Piper when deciding to ultimately buy my 170. And this is from someone who learned in a Piper and my first airplane was a Piper. Apache that is :lol:
1955 C170B N2993D s/n 26936
1986 DG-400 N9966C
hilltop170
Posts: 3481
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 6:05 pm

Re: Cessna 170 Resale values

Post by hilltop170 »

I flew a Stinson 108-3 with a Lycoming O-540 from Boston to Anchorage last June for a new pilot not tailwheel qualified. What a hoot it was to fly that plane! it was off in 300' with full gas and survival gear and cruised in the yellow. BUT, the seats were not very comfortable and had little adjustment. The 170 is much more comfortable and pleasant to fly. Plus, I just like metal skin airplanes more than fabric with their periodic major expense to recover.
Richard Pulley
2014-2016 TIC170A Past President
1951 170A, N1715D, s/n 20158, O-300D
Owned from 1973 to 1984.
Bought again in 2006 after 22 years.
It's not for sale!
User avatar
Joe Moilanen
Posts: 596
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 5:45 am

Re: Cessna 170 Resale values

Post by Joe Moilanen »

Twenty nine years ago today I bought my first airplane for 17K. It was a beautiful '53 170B and everyone told me that I paid too much. It was the best investment that I ever made. It may also be the last airplane that I ever buy. Hoping for another twenty nine years of fun with it...

Joe
4518C
Post Reply