Call for Tailwheel spring thickness data

How to keep the Cessna 170 flying and airworthy.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

User avatar
Bruce Fenstermacher
Posts: 10313
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am

Call for Tailwheel spring thickness data

Post by Bruce Fenstermacher »

We are looking for data points to try to determine the thickness of each spring in the tailwheel spring pack. If you suspect your 170 has some old perhaps original springs. Please try to measure them as close as you can and report back with their thicknesses. We will use share results of our data collection with Univair in hopes they can support us with a better fit spring pack.

We are looking for all data taken. From very early indications it appears the top spring should be under .200", we have samples of .180", 190" and .196". The second spring down should be about .180" to .190". The third spring should be between .235" and .254". The main spring should be .312". We are looking for the total thickness of the spring pack to be very close to .951"

What do you have. Thanks for the effort.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!

Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
User avatar
DaveF
Posts: 1516
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:44 am

Re: Call for Tailwheel spring thickness data

Post by DaveF »

Two old main springs: both .312

Currently installed:
top: .170
second: .170
third: .233
main: .322 bought new from Univair in 2018

All measured with a digital calipers. Main springs measured in caliper mode, upper springs measured using the extendo-thingy on the end.

The first time I replaced the main spring, everything went back together exactly as it came out. In 2018 it was a tighter fit and I had to adjust the shimming to make it work. Now I see that's because the new spring is thicker. I'm referring to the forward shim that sits on the top of the spring pack, parts catalog figure/index 29-10, p/n 0510000-30, "shim". The aft shim fixed to the bottom of the bracket is present.

The logs have no entries to indicate that the second, third, and fourth springs have ever been replaced.

EDIT: See revised measurements in post below.
Last edited by DaveF on Thu Feb 27, 2020 5:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
lowNslow
Posts: 1530
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 4:20 pm

Re: Call for Tailwheel spring thickness data

Post by lowNslow »

DaveF wrote:Two old main springs: both .312

Currently installed:
top: .170
second: .170
third: .233
main: .322 bought new from Univair in 2018
That totals .895 which quite a bit less then the .951 that Bruce was looking for. Seems like it would be a lot easier to install.
Karl
'53 170B N3158B SN:25400
ASW-20BL
User avatar
dstates
Posts: 472
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 5:50 pm

Re: Call for Tailwheel spring thickness data

Post by dstates »

Here are the thicknesses of the springs I took off my 170A. It has ~1300 hrs total time and the plane was in storage from the mid 1960’s till 2003 so I am confident they are old.

Measurements taken with digital calipers.

Top: 0.190
Second: 0.190”
Third: 0.250”
Main: 0.322”

I purchased a new set from Univair. I can measure those this weekend. The new stack is thicker. You can see that in the second picture.

Doug
39111CFD-0F2A-4379-9311-83A5BAA8F056.jpeg
04DF8D95-0431-4C8A-A61B-70066CC5C33C.jpeg
N1235D - 1951 170A - SN: 20118
User avatar
DaveF
Posts: 1516
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:44 am

Re: Call for Tailwheel spring thickness data

Post by DaveF »

DaveF wrote:Two old main springs: both .312

Currently installed:
top: .170
second: .170
third: .233
main: .322 bought new from Univair in 2018

All measured with a digital calipers. Main springs measured in caliper mode, upper springs measured using the extendo-thingy on the end.

The first time I replaced the main spring, everything went back together exactly as it came out. In 2018 it was a tighter fit and I had to adjust the shimming to make it work. Now I see that's because the new spring is thicker. I'm referring to the forward shim that sits on the top of the spring pack, parts catalog figure/index 29-10, p/n 0510000-30, "shim". The aft shim fixed to the bottom of the bracket is present.

The logs have no entries to indicate that the second, third, and fourth springs have ever been replaced.
Re-measure only using the normal caliper function, not the depth probe. Measured with the spring pack on the airplane, which is not the best way to do it.

Results, top leaf to main leaf:
0.193
0.192
0.233
0.322
total: 0.940
This agrees a lot better with what we expect

I was unable to directly measure the full thickness because the (new) main leaf has the wrong bend and doesn't nest with the other springs. Between the thickness and poor bend, it was hard to get the pack into the bracket. That's the best one I could find, even sorting through Univair's box of finished goods springs in November 2018. I hope they get their act together on this.
SpringPackMIsfit_rsz_img_4872.jpg

Method, in case you're interested:
Measure main leaf directly: 0.322
Measure sum of main and second: 0.555
Measure sum of main, second, and third: 0.747
Measure second, third, fourth: 0.618

Main leaf = 0.322
Second leaf = .555-.322 = 0.233
Third leaf = .747-.555 = 0.192
Top leaf = .618-.233-.192 = 0.193
User avatar
Bruce Fenstermacher
Posts: 10313
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am

Re: Call for Tailwheel spring thickness data

Post by Bruce Fenstermacher »

Thanks Doug and Dave. Doug, you old pack would fit my new bracket. Dave, yours will not.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!

Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
User avatar
DaveF
Posts: 1516
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:44 am

Re: Call for Tailwheel spring thickness data

Post by DaveF »

Bruce Fenstermacher wrote:Thanks Doug and Dave. Doug, you old pack would fit my new bracket. Dave, yours will not.
Why? Our packs are about the same -- Doug's is 0.952, mine is 0.940. The difference is within the tolerance of the paint thicknesses. When I installed the new thicker spring, I had to use a 0.025" forward shim instead of the previous .032".
User avatar
Bruce Fenstermacher
Posts: 10313
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am

Re: Call for Tailwheel spring thickness data

Post by Bruce Fenstermacher »

DaveF wrote: Why? Our packs are about the same -- Doug's is 0.952, mine is 0.940. The difference is within the tolerance of the paint thicknesses. When I installed the new thicker spring, I had to use a 0.025" forward shim instead of the previous .032".
Cause I can't operate a calculator I guess. :oops:

Thanks Dave.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!

Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
User avatar
DaveF
Posts: 1516
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:44 am

Re: Call for Tailwheel spring thickness data

Post by DaveF »

Well, I didn't help by posting totally wrong numbers in my first post!
User avatar
wingnut
Posts: 988
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:58 pm

Re: Call for Tailwheel spring thickness data

Post by wingnut »

I have a complete new old stock tail cone assembly for a 170B. It still had the original Cessna pick tag wired to it when I bought it, and also included the leaf springs.
I have reason to believe the springs have been with the tail cone assembly since it left Cessna.
The springs measure as follows;
#1 (bottom main leaf) is .312 thick, forward bend is 10.8 degrees, aft bend is 9.3 degrees
#2 is .250 thick, bend is 11.7 degrees
#3 is .195 thick, bend is 13.9 degrees
#4 (top) is .185 thick, bend is 14.7 degrees
Del Lehmann
Mena, Arkansas
User avatar
wingnut
Posts: 988
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:58 pm

Re: Call for Tailwheel spring thickness data

Post by wingnut »

One other interesting tidbit; all of these Cessna NOS leaf springs were already chamfered/beveled, so as not to wear into the springs below them. I've not seen this with any aftermarket springs.

I'm guessing these are the only full set of OEM new springs in the wild. Maybe someone else has some, but these are definitely better quality than anything I've seen before.
Del Lehmann
Mena, Arkansas
User avatar
Bruce Fenstermacher
Posts: 10313
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am

Re: Call for Tailwheel spring thickness data

Post by Bruce Fenstermacher »

Good stuff Del. Really appreciate it.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!

Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
User avatar
c170b53
Posts: 2527
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 8:01 pm

Re: Call for Tailwheel spring thickness data

Post by c170b53 »

Checked the old springs, mainspring wasn’t old, spring above main .245, above that .190 lost the one above that. The springs were particle blasted so I guess with primer and paint to both sides might add .005 to the dimensions.
Jim McIntosh..
1953 C170B S/N 25656
02 K1200RS
bella
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 7:48 pm

Re: Call for Tailwheel spring thickness data

Post by bella »

I just removed mine that have been on this aircraft for 520 hr. (2005) I measured old and the new Univair that I have had for two years on the shelf. It took longer to reach 500 hrs than I thought. Also my new springs where not fitting and I was trying to figure out what to do when I discovered this in the retaining channel new one on order.
The crack runs about an inch.
The crack runs about an inch.
The thickness of the old springs starting with the top going down to the longest:
1- .195
2- .193
3- .254
4- .323
New Univair Springs :
1- .223
2- .225
3- .273
4- .330
My understanding is the new channel will not be drilled so I should be able to fit the new springs with a custom drilled channel. (I hope)
I hope you can see the crack in the corner.
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 20967
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Call for Tailwheel spring thickness data

Post by GAHorn »

I would like to reemphasize that replacing ALL the springs is not particularly beneficial IMO.
I recommend only to replace the lower, main spring. It’s the one that breaks, not the others, and that will likely avoid the thickness problems of the new spring-stacks.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
Post Reply