Battery Cables Crimp or Solder?

How to keep the Cessna 170 flying and airworthy.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

Post Reply
User avatar
nippaero
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2016 1:05 am

Battery Cables Crimp or Solder?

Post by nippaero »

Making up some new 4 AWG battery cables. Should I crimp or solder them? Or both? I do have a hydraulic crimper like this one

https://www.amazon.com/Hydraulic-Crimpe ... re+crimper

Just wondering what other have done. I think Mil-Spec calls for crimping....
1952 170B
N8180A s/n 25032
User avatar
FredM
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 7:24 am

Re: Battery Cables Crimp or Solder?

Post by FredM »

Crimp only should work fine. I have only seen solder used on small butt connections.
Fred L. Mahan
51 C170A N1289D
User avatar
lowNslow
Posts: 1530
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 4:20 pm

Re: Battery Cables Crimp or Solder?

Post by lowNslow »

Which ever way you use be sure align the connectors on the cable so they will align with the terminal lugs. Cable this thick does not really twist like smaller gauge wire.
I used solder pellets and they worked great. http://www.delcity.net/store/Terminal-S ... 103464.t_1
Karl
'53 170B N3158B SN:25400
ASW-20BL
User avatar
Bruce Fenstermacher
Posts: 10318
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am

Re: Battery Cables Crimp or Solder?

Post by Bruce Fenstermacher »

I was about to say that would be one heck of a large soldering iron. But then I watched the install video Karl linked. Pretty cool.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!

Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
User avatar
gfeher
Posts: 571
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2014 9:19 pm

Re: Battery Cables Crimp or Solder?

Post by gfeher »

Nippaero, at least for smaller gauges, crimping is preferred because soldering tends to stiffen the wire at the connection, which can cause stress risers and shorten the life of the connection. I changed what appeared to be the original battery and starter cables and ground strap on my plane last year, and they (the originals) were all crimped (and lasted decades). I crimped the new ones as well, but used the heavy-duty, long-handled crimper we had at the shop. I've heard that the hydraulic crimpers like the one you've identified do a good job as well, but I have not used one. I like the fact that it does a hex crimp. If I were you, I wouldnt hesitate to crimp your cables with your crimper.
Gene Feher
Argyle (1C3), NY
'52 170B N2315D s/n 20467 C-145-2
Experimental J3 Cub Copy N7GW O-200
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21004
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Battery Cables Crimp or Solder?

Post by GAHorn »

gfeher wrote:Nippaero, at least for smaller gauges, crimping is preferred because soldering tends to stiffen the wire at the connection, which can cause stress risers and shorten the life of the connection. I changed what appeared to be the original battery and starter cables and ground strap on my plane last year, and they (the originals) were all crimped (and lasted decades). I crimped the new ones as well, but used the heavy-duty, long-handled crimper we had at the shop. I've heard that the hydraulic crimpers like the one you've identified do a good job as well, but I have not used one. I like the fact that it does a hex crimp. If I were you, I wouldnt hesitate to crimp your cables with your crimper.
Exactly.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
lowNslow
Posts: 1530
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 4:20 pm

Re: Battery Cables Crimp or Solder?

Post by lowNslow »

gfeher wrote:Nippaero, at least for smaller gauges, crimping is preferred because soldering tends to stiffen the wire at the connection, which can cause stress risers and shorten the life of the connection. I changed what appeared to be the original battery and starter cables and ground strap on my plane last year, and they (the originals) were all crimped (and lasted decades). I crimped the new ones as well, but used the heavy-duty, long-handled crimper we had at the shop. I've heard that the hydraulic crimpers like the one you've identified do a good job as well, but I have not used one. I like the fact that it does a hex crimp. If I were you, I wouldnt hesitate to crimp your cables with your crimper.
I can see this possibly being an issue with smaller gauge wire but I don't think it is really an issue with larger "cable" gauge material. Even with the smaller gauge wire I wonder. I just finished completely rewiring my aircraft and while I used crimped connectors through out, except the cables, couldn't help but notice that all the 63 year old soldered connections were in great shape.
Karl
'53 170B N3158B SN:25400
ASW-20BL
User avatar
gfeher
Posts: 571
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2014 9:19 pm

Re: Battery Cables Crimp or Solder?

Post by gfeher »

I hear you Karl and wonder as well with respect to large gauges, like for battery cables. I think crimping is easier though if like Nippaero, you already have a crimper to do the job. Either way, if done correctly, the cables should last a long time. So as a practical matter, the debate may be somewhat academic.
Gene Feher
Argyle (1C3), NY
'52 170B N2315D s/n 20467 C-145-2
Experimental J3 Cub Copy N7GW O-200
flyboy122
Posts: 324
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 2:30 am

Re: Battery Cables Crimp or Solder?

Post by flyboy122 »

We crimp all our cables on the helicopters at work and that is considered a much more severe environment than our smooth Cessnas. On the other hand, my Dad soldered terminals for years and years and they are still good today. I wouldn't hesitate to use either method. Since I have access to the proper crimpers at work that's my preference, but if I didn't I would solder them.

DEM
User avatar
nippaero
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2016 1:05 am

Re: Battery Cables Crimp or Solder?

Post by nippaero »

Thanks for the suggestions guys. I ended up just using the crimper I had. They durned out fine. That 4 AWG wire is pretty stiff. I have used quality 4 AWG welding wire on two RV's and a Challenger II I recently rebuilt. Much more flexible. So I am learning new things with the 170.
1952 170B
N8180A s/n 25032
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21004
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Battery Cables Crimp or Solder?

Post by GAHorn »

AC43.13-1b, Acceptable Methods, Techniques, Materials, etc.... Chapter 11, Electrical, Paras 11-103 Junctions, 11-167 Splices, 11-174 Terminals... time and again states words to the effect " Ensure that only aircraft manufacturer approved devices, such as solderless type terminals, terminal blocks, connectors, disconnect splices, permanent splices, and feed-through bushings are used for cable junctions. ..."

and

"Solderless, crimp connections are preferred... over soldered..."

The reason is as previously stated. Soldered connections stiffen the wire-ends making them subject to breakage from vibration, and corrosion from dissimilar materials.

Whenever possible, use aviation quality wire and crimp-style connectors.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
lowNslow
Posts: 1530
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 4:20 pm

Re: Battery Cables Crimp or Solder?

Post by lowNslow »

gahorn wrote: "Solderless, crimp connections are preferred... over soldered..."

The reason is as previously stated. Soldered connections stiffen the wire-ends making them subject to breakage from vibration, and corrosion from dissimilar materials.

Whenever possible, use aviation quality wire and crimp-style connectors.
This was the statement I was questioning. In all my years working on old planes, old cars and old electronics I have never seen evidence of this. Not to say it doesn't happen.
In any case, crimped connectors are usually faster to install.
Karl
'53 170B N3158B SN:25400
ASW-20BL
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21004
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Battery Cables Crimp or Solder?

Post by GAHorn »

In a wire-bundle, or conduit, or even single-conductor routings along structure, the connection or splice is usually supported alongside with clamps, spaghetti, or other wires, so movement is almost nil and the vibration has less effect. But imagine a wire leading from the engine accessory to the firewall,...as it dangles in open air, with one end attached to a non-moving firewall and the other to a shock-mounted engine... considerable vibration and movement will affect the connection.
However, in general, AC43.13 provides guidance which is consistently advisable in all cases. (Soldered connections are not prohibited...but the vulnerabilities of that type are real.)
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
Post Reply