Need Fig.25-24, p/n 0512108-5 Bulkhead Assembly Angle - Stab
Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher
- Bruce Fenstermacher
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am
Need Fig.25-24, p/n 0512108-5 Bulkhead Assembly Angle - Stab
So I get a text from Jim Wildharber asking be if I have a good part p/n 0512108-5 Bulkhead Assembly Angle - Stabilizer attachment. I say that's really strange whats wrong with it. He says the holes are worn (slotted or egged out). I say that is really strange cause this is the second time in less than a month I have a member contact me for the same part for the same reason, egged out holes. What are the chances the same wild man with a file attacked the holes in two airplanes, and they be discovered within a month.
I tell Jim there is probably more to the story and that he should have Del figure out why someone would do this.
Well it turns out the Association also owns a part with egged out holes. The mad man with a file is starting to get around. Or maybe, just maybe Cessna made the parts this way.
I believe the consensus of Del and George Horn, who has the Associations part in hand, is yes, Cessna slotted the parts.
So how about we get everyone to go look at their parts and lets see how many slotted parts are in the field. Here are some pictures of slotted and unslotted brackets.
I tell Jim there is probably more to the story and that he should have Del figure out why someone would do this.
Well it turns out the Association also owns a part with egged out holes. The mad man with a file is starting to get around. Or maybe, just maybe Cessna made the parts this way.
I believe the consensus of Del and George Horn, who has the Associations part in hand, is yes, Cessna slotted the parts.
So how about we get everyone to go look at their parts and lets see how many slotted parts are in the field. Here are some pictures of slotted and unslotted brackets.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!
Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 3481
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 6:05 pm
Re: Need Fig.25-24, p/n 0512108-5 Bulkhead Assembly Angle -
Those slotted holes sure look to be machined that way. There is even peeling paint on the inside of the slot in the close-up.
Richard Pulley
2014-2016 TIC170A Past President
1951 170A, N1715D, s/n 20158, O-300D
Owned from 1973 to 1984.
Bought again in 2006 after 22 years.
It's not for sale!
2014-2016 TIC170A Past President
1951 170A, N1715D, s/n 20158, O-300D
Owned from 1973 to 1984.
Bought again in 2006 after 22 years.
It's not for sale!
- sfarringer
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:49 pm
Re: Need Fig.25-24, p/n 0512108-5 Bulkhead Assembly Angle -
Might be interesting to know if the ones with slotted holes are found on 170's made toward the end of production.
It does seem like a slot would make a low-stress mounting more likely, minimizing stress on the bulkhead that the front of the stabilizer attaches to.
It does seem like a slot would make a low-stress mounting more likely, minimizing stress on the bulkhead that the front of the stabilizer attaches to.
Ragwing S/N 18073
-
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 1:52 am
Re: Need Fig.25-24, p/n 0512108-5 Bulkhead Assembly Angle -
On both of the Cessna 170A's that I have rebuilt the Tail cones on they were round holes. But those slotted holes sure look factory to me.
Jim
Jim
A&P, IA, New owner C170A N1208D, Have rebuilt some 50 aircraft. So many airplanes, So little time!
- Bruce Fenstermacher
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am
Re: Need Fig.25-24, p/n 0512108-5 Bulkhead Assembly Angle -
Jim's plane is a '55 and the other Showboatsix has a '56 172 conversion. Bet this is a late model production change.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!
Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
- Bruce Fenstermacher
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am
Re: Need Fig.25-24, p/n 0512108-5 Bulkhead Assembly Angle -
Well huh. Thinking this might have been a late production change to the part I looked at the A model IPC and compared it to the B model. Same part number including the -5. That is not conclusive but generally Cessna changed the dash number when a part changed at all.
Next I looked at the '56 IPC. Started to think ah huh, this was probably a change to accommodate both the old elevator and the new 172 design. But I can't find a figure that shows clearly how the rear elevator attaches in a early 172. What I found looks like this part or anything like it did not exist in a 172. Yet Showboatsix asked specifically about pn 0512108-5 in his '56.
The mystery takes a strange twist. I've now got to find an early 172 and look to see how they were built.
Next I looked at the '56 IPC. Started to think ah huh, this was probably a change to accommodate both the old elevator and the new 172 design. But I can't find a figure that shows clearly how the rear elevator attaches in a early 172. What I found looks like this part or anything like it did not exist in a 172. Yet Showboatsix asked specifically about pn 0512108-5 in his '56.
The mystery takes a strange twist. I've now got to find an early 172 and look to see how they were built.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!
Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 1:52 am
Re: Need Fig.25-24, p/n 0512108-5 Bulkhead Assembly Angle -
My buddies 1956 172TD does not have a part like this at all, it is a casting the same as later 172's and the bolts that attache the stabilizer rear spar are installed fore and aft or longitudinally. Where as the 170's all have vertical attachment bolts. I have always found this interesting because the prototype 170C was converted back into a 170B after the project was completed. And I presume as there is no documentation that I know of showing how the Horizontal was attached on that airplane. I suppose it could have been either way. But would have required Cessna to convert the rear bulkhead after going back to the rounded empennage if it had been a casting.Bruce Fenstermacher wrote:Well huh. Thinking this might have been a late production change to the part I looked at the A model IPC and compared it to the B model. Same part number including the -5. That is not conclusive but generally Cessna changed the dash number when a part changed at all.
Next I looked at the '56 IPC. Started to think ah huh, this was probably a change to accommodate both the old elevator and the new 172 design. But I can't find a figure that shows clearly how the rear elevator attaches in a early 172. What I found looks like this part or anything like it did not exist in a 172. Yet Showboatsix asked specifically about pn 0512108-5 in his '56.
The mystery takes a strange twist. I've now got to find an early 172 and look to see how they were built.
I now have a mission to look at every 170 I see to see how it is configured holes or slots.
A&P, IA, New owner C170A N1208D, Have rebuilt some 50 aircraft. So many airplanes, So little time!
- ghostflyer
- Posts: 1395
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:06 am
Re: Need Fig.25-24, p/n 0512108-5 Bulkhead Assembly Angle -
Just checked my 170 A serial number 19006 and it's only has round holes for attachment. As I have recently refitted my tail feathers due to SIDS inspection it was a very smug fitting all round .
[oops, smug means very tight . Aussie translation ]
[oops, smug means very tight . Aussie translation ]
Re: Need Fig.25-24, p/n 0512108-5 Bulkhead Assembly Angle -
I looked this morning 53B model 25501 has holes no slots.
John E. Barrett
aka. Johneb
Sent from my "Cray Super Computer"
aka. Johneb
Sent from my "Cray Super Computer"
Re: Need Fig.25-24, p/n 0512108-5 Bulkhead Assembly Angle -
Well, here's another data point. I was at the airport today so I crawled under and checked the attachment on my plane (a '52). All four holes are slotted the same way. See below which is the best photo showing the elongation. It's just one of the bolts/holes. The others are similarly slotted. Note that in Bruce's photo above showing the two different attachments (one with round holes and one with slotted holes), you can see that the holes of the one with round holes are located near the edge. On the one with the slotted holes, the elongation starts at this same location and projects inward from the edge. On my plane, the bolts are located in the side of the slot closest to the edge -- where they would be located if the version of the attachment without slots was used. They are not located in the elongated portion, which I think you would expect if the elongation was caused by the bolt. One other thing: when I first crawled under the plane, there was loose paint around the nut in the attached photo covering the elongation. I carefully looked at it to see if I could detect any evidence of movement and didn't see any. I used my finger nail to remove the paint (some of which was over the elongation) to reveal and better see the elongation. (The photo was taken after the paint was removed.) If the elongation were caused by the bolt, I would not expect to see paint around the nut in that area, especially over the elongation. The plane was last painted in the 1980's, so I'm guessing that the attachment has been that way since at least that time. (Yes, repainting my plane is on my list.) (If you are wondering about the unpainted nut on the left in the photo, according to my log, it was installed during the 2012 annual when some corroded hardware in that area was replaced. I choose the nut I photographed because it appeared to be original. In other words, the paint on it was not disturbed -- until I disturbed it).
Gene Feher
Argyle (1C3), NY
'52 170B N2315D s/n 20467 C-145-2
Experimental J3 Cub Copy N7GW O-200
Argyle (1C3), NY
'52 170B N2315D s/n 20467 C-145-2
Experimental J3 Cub Copy N7GW O-200
- cessna170bdriver
- Posts: 4062
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 5:13 pm
Re: Need Fig.25-24, p/n 0512108-5 Bulkhead Assembly Angle -
1955 sn 26541:
Miles
“I envy no man that knows more than myself, but pity them that know less.”
— Thomas Browne
“I envy no man that knows more than myself, but pity them that know less.”
— Thomas Browne
Re: Need Fig.25-24, p/n 0512108-5 Bulkhead Assembly Angle -
Here you go Bruce, My 1953 P/N0512108-5 Stab Blkhd fitting has holes not slots.
Dennis
Dennis
Re: Need Fig.25-24, p/n 0512108-5 Bulkhead Assembly Angle -
170B SN25400 - holes no slots.
Karl
'53 170B N3158B SN:25400
ASW-20BL
'53 170B N3158B SN:25400
ASW-20BL
Re: Need Fig.25-24, p/n 0512108-5 Bulkhead Assembly Angle -
As a base point, my 1955 170b is serial no. 26958. Pictures, posted by Bruce of the slotted holes, were taken by Del when he started maintenance work.
Jim Wildharber, Kennesaw, GA
Past President TIC170A (2010-12) and Georgia Area Representative
'55 170B, N3415D, SN:26958, O-300D; People's Choice '06 Kelowna, B.C., Best Modified '07 Galveston, TX, Best Modified '08 Branson, MO.
Past President TIC170A (2010-12) and Georgia Area Representative
'55 170B, N3415D, SN:26958, O-300D; People's Choice '06 Kelowna, B.C., Best Modified '07 Galveston, TX, Best Modified '08 Branson, MO.
Re: Need Fig.25-24, p/n 0512108-5 Bulkhead Assembly Angle -
53 S/N 25656 holes,
Obviously bolts are in tension, so I wonder if it's a Cessna fix for a build variance between the stabilizer and the distance to the aft bulkhead forward of the stab ?
Obviously bolts are in tension, so I wonder if it's a Cessna fix for a build variance between the stabilizer and the distance to the aft bulkhead forward of the stab ?
Jim McIntosh..
1953 C170B S/N 25656
02 K1200RS
1953 C170B S/N 25656
02 K1200RS