Who's been best for our O-300 Crankcase Overhaul Inspections

How to keep the Cessna 170 flying and airworthy.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

an8pilot
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 6:18 pm

Who's been best for our O-300 Crankcase Overhaul Inspections

Post by an8pilot »

Who's been best for our O-300 Crancase Overhaul Inspections

Hi fella's

Just wondering who has been the best for overhaul and inspection of our O-300' Crankcases.

I am on deployment right now but need to get my case sent out for inspection.

This crankcase was overhauled a long time ago by Columbia Aircraft Services Bloomsburg Pa and sat on the shelf.

Actually I have two crank cases its just this one I have someone to ship it and the other one no one there to ship.

Over the years I have become vary wary of people throwing aircraft parts on the assembly line and doing every service
available whether it needs it or not.

Not looking forward to someone saying they want to face the split line faces of the case where the halves mate so
they can charge me for a line bore that is not needed and end up in a situation where the case is worse off then it was
if I had just thrown it back together with possibilities of the accessory case misalignment, journals not being properly
bored and oversize or undersize, cracks from welding, and journal pins that hold bearing journal becoming loose by being removed.

I have an IO-540 narrow deck crank case I want inspected to but I imagine those of us here with our O-300's would know who is best on our O-300 engines.

Heard lots of horror stories.

Mike Robinson
User avatar
T. C. Downey
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:58 am

Re: Who's been best for our O-300 Crankcase Overhaul Inspect

Post by T. C. Downey »

Ney enterprises at Tulsa OK , explain what you want done.

he is the inventor of the Ney nozzle that cures the 0-320 H 2 AD problems.
User avatar
cessna170bdriver
Posts: 4062
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 5:13 pm

Re: Who's been best for our O-300 Crankcase Overhaul Inspect

Post by cessna170bdriver »

It's been 8 years now, but I was very happy with the work Nickson's Machine Shop in Santa Maria, CA did on my case, as well as the internals of my O-300A. Ask for Klaus.
Miles

“I envy no man that knows more than myself, but pity them that know less.”
— Thomas Browne
an8pilot
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 6:18 pm

Re: Who's been best for our O-300 Crankcase Overhaul Inspect

Post by an8pilot »

Thanks fellas,

Turns out I found a case that was overhauled many years ago to send in instead for inspection.

It is a O-300-D case by serial number, and since I am deployed right now I am not where I have info to see if I can use it.

There is also no one at home to send my A case in for overhaul but this D case that was originally overhauled is in a place where it can
be shipped.

But;

I know I can use a large flange A crank with a D case,

but I'm unsure if the D case will accept the A accessory housing, gears, and oil pump, and the B&C starter that I had bought for the A case.

I do know that there is an oil gallery in the D case that needs to be plugged that went to the D starter.

But the above is all I know at the moment.

A cases never had a hole for a pump on the right side of the forward nose case did they?

All my notes are at home.
User avatar
T. C. Downey
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:58 am

Re: Who's been best for our O-300 Crankcase Overhaul Inspect

Post by T. C. Downey »

Aryana wrote:The A case does have the hole on the right side of the forward nose.

Funny thing,, the 48 - 170 came from the factory with a C-145-A with a fuel pump on the nose of the case.
an8pilot
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 6:18 pm

Re: Who's been best for our O-300 Crankcase Overhaul Inspect

Post by an8pilot »

huh.... I didn't know that. Being so far away from home without pictures of my A case and no illustrations or books I didn't remember there being a hole there on the right side nose of the case.
User avatar
T. C. Downey
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:58 am

Re: Who's been best for our O-300 Crankcase Overhaul Inspect

Post by T. C. Downey »

an8pilot wrote:huh.... I didn't know that. Being so far away from home without pictures of my A case and no illustrations or books I didn't remember there being a hole there on the right side nose of the case.
The left and right cases are the same from the C-125 thru the 0-300-D, there are 3 different accessory cases, two versions of the sump.
an8pilot
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 6:18 pm

Re: Who's been best for our O-300 Crankcase Overhaul Inspect

Post by an8pilot »

Actually the cases got beefed up over the years with the D model being the heaviest.
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 20989
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Who's been best for our O-300 Crankcase Overhaul Inspect

Post by GAHorn »

T. C. Downey wrote:...The left and right cases are the same from the C-125 thru the 0-300-D, there are 3 different accessory cases, two versions of the sump.
Not exactly. There were at least three different cases produced. The earliest(C125/145 cases) had no nuts on the thru bolts at the front/right. The latest (so-called "heavy" case) was produced and used on the O300-C, D, and E engines and had 7/16" nuts on the thru bolts. There were other minor differences such as early studs were "wet" and later ones were blind at the cyl bases, etc. (You probably know that and were just simplifying matters, but I wanted to complicate things.) :wink:
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
T. C. Downey
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:58 am

Re: Who's been best for our O-300 Crankcase Overhaul Inspect

Post by T. C. Downey »

you talk hardware, I was speaking of the castings.
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 20989
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Who's been best for our O-300 Crankcase Overhaul Inspect

Post by GAHorn »

T. C. Downey wrote:you talk hardware, I was speaking of the castings.
The castings are also different. How else would you turn open-ended "wet" studs into blind studs?
How else would you provide for nuts on thru bolts? What about the thru bolts at the bottom-center of the case, etc etc ?
A simple check of the Parts Manual will also demonstrate 3 different part numbers for crankcases applicable to different "dash" number engines to accommodate these differences.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
T. C. Downey
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:58 am

Re: Who's been best for our O-300 Crankcase Overhaul Inspect

Post by T. C. Downey »

gahorn wrote:
T. C. Downey wrote:you talk hardware, I was speaking of the castings.
The castings are also different. How else would you turn open-ended "wet" studs into blind studs?
By "studs" you mean the "thru bolt" the "O" ring type will fit the same thru cast bore as the non "O" Ring type, and vise versa.
How else would you provide for nuts on thru bolts?

simple, you up grade to the "O" ring type

What about the thru bolts at the bottom-center of the case, etc etc ?

Those are stopped at the case center seam by sealant

A simple check of the Parts Manual will also demonstrate 3 different part numbers for crankcases applicable to different "dash" number engines to accommodate these differences.
All the P/Ns from the old Parts catalog have been updated to after market suppliers numbers that all interchange..

I up grade all the engines I build to "O" Rings on the thru case bolts that hold the cylinders to the case and seal the case at the lower case thru bolts.
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 20989
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Who's been best for our O-300 Crankcase Overhaul Inspect

Post by GAHorn »

Well, now you're talking technique... not crankcase casting differences.
The studs I was referring are those which are open-ended (so-called "wet" because they eventually leak) in the crankcase vs those which are "blind" such as cyl base studs, etc. There are so many differences in castings that I only mentioned the most obvious.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
T. C. Downey
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:58 am

Re: Who's been best for our O-300 Crankcase Overhaul Inspect

Post by T. C. Downey »

Getting back to subject, tell me which P/N has no hole for the fuel pump.

The case halves can't be ordered new by any part number, we must get them from used part sources , So the 3 different numbers issue is a moot point.

Any two cases can be be made a match set, as long as there material to lap and line bore and still meet the deck height tolerances.
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 20989
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Who's been best for our O-300 Crankcase Overhaul Inspect

Post by GAHorn »

T. C. Downey wrote:
Aryana wrote:The A case does have the hole on the right side of the forward nose.

Funny thing,, the 48 - 170 came from the factory with a C-145-A with a fuel pump on the nose of the case.
I don't know who thought that they don't have a mount-pad for a pump. (But I never heard of a C-145-A before either ).... :wink:
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
Post Reply